Asynchronous Operations (Was: [ZOOM]
mike at indexdata.com
Fri Feb 6 17:37:12 CET 2004
> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:13:03 +0000 (GMT)
> From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth at liverpool.ac.uk>
> > I would prefer that the Asynchronous AAPI (AAAPI?) not depend on
> > threads, in part because they are not universally available.
> In the model of W3C and C3PO, how about: A3PI?
Brilliant! Utterly brilliant! I am currently going through a
six-year-old-son-induced _Star Wars_ obsession revival anyway (I've
just bought lego kits for an X-wing and TIE fighter) so this really
hits the spot. I am prepared to back down on Get/Set Option methods
in the Java binding, but on this issue, I will not be gainsaid: A3PI
> Err, anyway...
You were saying? :-)
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike at indexdata.com> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "The fighting must begin before another someone dies" --
Ritchie Blackmore's Rainbow, _16th Century Greensleeves_. Eh?
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
More information about the ZOOM