[ZOOM] hello and first impressions of the C++ bindings
mike at tecc.co.uk
Wed Nov 7 14:21:06 CET 2001
> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 12:57:00 +0000 (GMT)
> From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth at liverpool.ac.uk>
> > Nope. But then I suppose in the end we can't guarantee that no
> > database names will include a NUL either, so we just have to live
> > with this sort of stupidity.
> See also the slippery slope of not letting people at bits of Z39.50.
> Yes I'm being pedantic, but that's what is necessary in order to be
> consistent. This would be a precedent for -not- allowing access to
> -everything- the Z spec can do.
Yes indeed. I think that's legitimate (and I think you do too? :-)
> I wouldn't call a client that can handle broken servers itself
> broken, but fair enough.
I would if in doing so it makes working servers look broken. But
don't let me stop you from building intelligence into your
> For that matter, forget Explain ;)
We all did that long ago :-(
> > > Is a diagnostics object too heavy a solution?
> > I don't understand what you mean by "diagnostics object".
> An object that maintains ( ;P ) information about diagnostics
> regarding a particular operation. For example, simply extract the
> error etc properties from all of your current objects and have a
> pointer to a diagnostics object.
How is that different from ZOOM::bib1Error in 1.0f?
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike at miketaylor.org.uk> www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "In order to progress as a writer you must learn to struggle
to put proper words in proper places" -- Bret Jolly.
More information about the ZOOM