[Ex-plain] Attribute Searches

Robert Sanderson azaroth at liverpool.ac.uk
Fri Apr 12 14:54:34 CEST 2002


> > > is: is anyone actually going tp implement more than 10% of this?
> > > And if not, let's just define the 10% so as to (A) save ourselves

> > I'll implement 100% of it. Which is why I proposed it all :)
> > Have an Explain-- profile.  If you want to be level 1 compliant you need 

> a lot of extra complexity.  But before we plough on into details,
> please can we hear from someone else?  Of the last 28 messages on this

> (Rob, I assume that you also are keen to avoid the two of us spinning
> off into the void as a two-man axis, leaving the rest of the world to
> catch up a few days later and go, "Huh?  What are these stupid
> decision they've made?")

*grins*  Yes.  

While we wait, perhaps we should plan our interface to Google
http://www.google.com/apis/      =)

Or more productively figure out a better set of element names/structure 
for v2

Rob

-- 
      ,'/:.          Rob Sanderson (azaroth at liverpool.ac.uk)
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Twin Cathedrals:  telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::.              WWW:  http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I





More information about the Ex-plain mailing list